EU law

The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ruled in Case C-590/22 PS, determining that mere infringement of GDPR is insufficient for compensation under Article 82(1). Claimants must demonstrate actual non-material damage, though it need not reach a specific severity. Fear of data disclosure can justify compensation if proven. The criteria for fines in Article 83 do not apply to damage awards, and compensation does not need to consider national law breaches not specifying GDPR rules.

CJEU Ruling on Compensation for Non-Material Damages based on fear [Case C-590/22 PS]

The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ruled in Case C-590/22 PS, determining that mere infringement of GDPR is insufficient for compensation under Article 82(1). Claimants must demonstrate actual non-material damage, though it need not reach a specific severity. Fear of data disclosure can justify compensation if proven. The criteria for fines in Article 83 do not apply to damage awards, and compensation does not need to consider national law breaches not specifying GDPR rules.

CJEU Ruling on Compensation for Non-Material Damages based on fear [Case C-590/22 PS] Read More »

The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled in merged cases C-182/22 and C-189/22 Scalable Capital, addressing compensation for non-material damage under GDPR Article 82(1) due to theft of personal data. The court clarified that compensation to individuals is purely compensatory, not punitive, and the severity of GDPR infringements by controllers is irrelevant for compensation purposes. The court emphasized that data breaches causing non-material damage are significant and may warrant minimal compensation even if not serious, provided they fully address the harm suffered.

CJEU Ruling on Compensation for Data Breach [C-182/22 and C-189/22 Scalable Capital]

The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled in merged cases C-182/22 and C-189/22 Scalable Capital, addressing compensation for non-material damage under GDPR Article 82(1) due to theft of personal data. The court clarified that compensation to individuals is purely compensatory, not punitive, and the severity of GDPR infringements by controllers is irrelevant for compensation purposes. The court emphasized that data breaches causing non-material damage are significant and may warrant minimal compensation even if not serious, provided they fully address the harm suffered.

CJEU Ruling on Compensation for Data Breach [C-182/22 and C-189/22 Scalable Capital] Read More »

Avanza Bank fined 1.34M EUR in Sweden for misconfiguration of Meta pixel

Meta has paused the launch of its AI tools in Europe after a request from Ireland’s Data Protection Commission (DPC). This decision comes after the digital rights group Noyb filed complaints in 11 European countries, criticizing Meta’s vague AI plans and the opt-out requirement for users. Meta planned to use public posts from Facebook and Instagram to train AI models. The DPC’s decision, welcomed by other European authorities, followed intensive discussions with Meta. Meta expressed disappointment, noting it had incorporated regulatory feedback since March.

Avanza Bank fined 1.34M EUR in Sweden for misconfiguration of Meta pixel Read More »

Meta Halts AI Rollout in Europe Following Irish DPC Request

Meta Halts AI Rollout in Europe Following Irish DPC Request

Meta has paused the launch of its AI tools in Europe after a request from Ireland’s Data Protection Commission (DPC). This decision comes after the digital rights group Noyb filed complaints in 11 European countries, criticizing Meta’s vague AI plans and the opt-out requirement for users. Meta planned to use public posts from Facebook and Instagram to train AI models. The DPC’s decision, welcomed by other European authorities, followed intensive discussions with Meta. Meta expressed disappointment, noting it had incorporated regulatory feedback since March.

Meta Halts AI Rollout in Europe Following Irish DPC Request Read More »

Scroll to Top